REFEREE FORM
Please return to: Managing Editors,
Online Journal of Veterinary Research, onlinejournals@gmail.com
(a) Writing a report on the
reverse
side of this form,
(b} Check the boxes shown below under
1. and 2. ( YES or NO) [N.B.A "NO" assessment must be
supported
by specific comment in the report.
(c) Make a recommendation under
3.
The Editor-in-Chief would appreciate hearing from any referee who feels that he/she will be unable to review a manuscript within two weeks.
1. CRITERIA FOR JUDGEMENT (Mark "Yes"
or
"No").
Is the work scientifically sound? Y
Is the work an original contribution? Y
Are the conclusions justified on the evidence presented? Y
Is the work free of major errors in fact, logic or technique? Y
Is the paper clearly and concisely written?Y
Do you consider that the data provided on the care and use of animals (See Instructions to Contributors) is sufficient to establish that the animals used in the experiments were well looked after, that care was taken to avoid distress, and that there was no unethical use of animals? (natural environment, sampling methods approved)
2 PRESENTATION (Mark "Yes" or
"No").
Does the title clearly indicate the content of the paper? Y
Does the abstract convey the essence of the article?Y
Are all the tables essential? Y
Are the figures and drawings of good quality? Y
Are the illustrations necessary for an understanding of the text? Y
Is the labelling adequate?Y
3. RECOMMENDATIONS(Mark one with an
X)
Not suitable for publication in the OJVR
Reassess after major changes
Accept for publication with minor changes
Accept for publication without changesX
4.
REPORT. This is a well written important comprehensive study of
tripasomomiasis resistance in African cattle, a severe problem in that
continent and other sub-tropical-tropical regions. This work will be of
interest to the WHO and FAO. It is innovative because the genetic
findings were supported with relevant physiological evaluations (PCV
and parasitaemia). Introduction: Relevant and properly
referenced, could have put description of cattle here instead of in
Methods although not essential. Material and Methods. Issue 1:
Exclusion of cattle due to excessive or few alleles is appropriate in
this case because the authors were trying to show a genetic component
to the resistance, so 11 v 18 ok as long as appropriate statistics were
used. Issue 2: Maybe a record of weight, age etc should have been done
as these parameters could influence the parasataemia (in any case I
could not find any of this data). Common Zebu component shown by
microsatellite analysis. The findings support the conclusion. I
recommend this work be published without changes.